Liquid water absorbs microwave radiation so strongly that they can be used to cook with.

Dielectric constant and polarization

Complex dielectric permittivity

Dielectric spectroscopy

Dielectric loss

Effect of salt

Electromagnetic penetration

The microwave oven is part of modern life, but how do the microwaves interact with water in food to efficiently heat the food? The water dipole^{ a} attempts
to continuously reorient in electromagnetic radiation's oscillating
electric field (see external
applet). Dependent on the frequency the dipole may move in time
to the field, lag behind it or remain apparently unaffected. When
the dipole lags behind the field then interactions between the dipole
and the field leads to an energy loss by heating, the extent of
which is dependent on the phase difference of these fields; heating
being maximal twice each cycle [455].^{ d} The ease of the movement depends on the viscosity and the mobility
of the electron clouds. In wate,r these in turn depend on the strength
and extent of the hydrogen-bonded network. In free liquid water,
this movement occurs at GHz frequencies (microwaves) whereas in
more restricted 'bound' water it occurs at MHz frequencies (short
radiowaves) and in ice at kHz frequencies (long radiowaves). The
re-orientation process may be modeled using a 'wait-and-switch'
process where the water molecule has to wait for a period of time
until favorable orientation of neighboring molecules occurs and
then the hydrogen bonds switch to the new molecule [343].
Microwave heating has been modeled using the TIP4P-FQ potential [570] and is due to the interaction of these moving dipoles. Although molecular vibrations of biomolecules may have microwave frequencies, it is not thought that such resonant coupling is significant due to their low energy compared with thermal energy and the strongly dampening aqueous environment [1331].

The applied field potential (E, volts) of electromagnetic radiation is given by;

E = E_{max}.cos(ωt)

where E_{max} is the amplitude of the potential, ω is the angular frequency in radians.second^{-1} and t is
the time (seconds). If the polarization lags behind the field by
the phase (δ,
radians) then the polarization (P, coulombs) varies
as

P = P_{max}.cos(ωt
- δ)

where P_{max} is the maximum value of
the polarization.

Hence the current (I, amperes) varies as

I = (dP/dt) = -ωP_{max}.sin(ωt
- δ)

The power (** P**, watts) given
out as heat is the average value of (current ˣ potential). This
is zero if there is no lag (that is, if δ = 0), otherwise

** P** = 0.5 P

[Back to Top ]

It is convenient to express the relative permittivity (dielectric constant)
in terms of a complex number (ε_{r}*, complex dielectric permittivity) defined as:

ε_{r}* = ε_{r}´
- i**Lf **

Where ε_{r}´ is the ability
of the material to be polarized by the external electric field, **Lf** (the loss factor, sometimes given as ε") quantifies the efficiency
with which the electromagnetic energy is converted to heat and i
= . This equation may be visualized
by considering the total current as the vector sum of the charging
current and the loss current; the angle δ as the phase difference (lag) between the electric field and the
resultant (orientation) polarization of the material (see similar
treatment in rheology).

tan(δ)
= loss current/charging current = **Lf**/ε_{r}´

(see derivation)

The terms (ε_{r}*, ε_{r}´, **Lf **) are all affected by the frequency of radiation;
the relative permittivity (ε_{r}´,
dielectric constant) at low frequencies (ε_{S},
static region^{ c}) and
at high ( visible) frequencies the (ε_{∞},
optical permittivity) are the limiting values. The relative permittivity
changes with the wavelength (and hence frequency):

where ε_{S} is the relative
permittivity at low frequencies (static region), and λ_{S} is the critical wavelength (maximum dielectric loss).

(see more on complex dielectric permittivity)

where τ is the relaxation time (a measure of the time required for
water to rotate (where
r is the molecular radius, k is the Boltzmann constant and η is the viscosity), also considered
as the delay for the particles to respond to the field change,
or for reversion after disorientation. The maximum loss occurs
when ω = 1/τ ^{ b}. For water at 25 °C, τ is
8.27 ps (for hexagonal ice at 0 °C, τ ~20 µs) and r is half the (diffraction-determined) inter-oxygen
distance (1.4 Å).

Shows the dimensionless dielectric and dielectric loss reducing with temperature

at the microwave oven frequency 2.45 GHz

**Figure 1.** Dielectric permittivity
and dielectric loss of water between 0 °C and 100 °C,
the arrows showing the effect of increasing temperature
or increasing water activity.. Data is indicative only but based on [64, 135]; exact
data is plotted below and has been reviewed [3089].
The wavelength range 0.01 - 100 cm is equivalent to 3 THz - 0.3 GHz respectively. As the temperature increases, the strength and extent
of the hydrogen bonding both decrease. This (1) lowers
both the static and optical dielectric permittivities,
(2) lessens the difficulty for the movement dipole
and so allows the water molecule to oscillate at higher
frequencies, and (3) reduces the drag to the rotation
of the water molecules, so reducing the friction and
hence the dielectric loss. Note that ε_{∞} (that is, the dielectric permittivity at short wavelengths) does not change significantly with temperature. Most of the dielectric
loss is within the microwave range of electromagnetic
radiation (~1 - ~300 GHz, with wavenumber 0.033 cm^{-1} - 10 cm^{-1}, and wavelength 0.3 m - 1.0 mm respectively). The frequency for maximum
dielectric loss lies higher than the 2.45 GHz (wavenumber 0.0817
cm^{-1}, wavelength 12.24 cm) produced by most microwave ovens.
This is so that the radiation is not totally absorbed
by the first layer of water it encounters and may
penetrate further into the foodstuff, heating it more
evenly; unabsorbed radiation passing through is mostly
reflected back, due to the design of the microwave
oven, and absorbed on later passes.

Water and ice Ih show similar dielectric behavior at the melting point but separated by about 10^{6} Hz, see left [2171].^{ d}

The above data can also be plotted using a Cole-Cole plot, as shown right, of the dielectric permittivity versus the dielectric loss. The red circular arcs show the effects of temperature varied by 20 °C amounts from O °C to 100 °C, whereas the blue lines show the variations with the temperatures at fixed wavelengths (1.3 - 201 GHz). Also shown for comparison is the plot (dashed line) for pure bulk ice [1230] (note the much lower frequencies).

Note that the shifts in the dielectric properties with temperature give rise to maxima in the temperature behavior at constant frequency.

Plotted opposite are equations derived for pure water over the range for -20 °C ~ +40 °C [683], extrapolated (dashed lines) to indicate trends. The equations that generate these curves involve 15 optimized parameters. Further data has been published [1185].

The temperature effect on the dielectric relaxation time is shown on another page.

The dielectric loss factor (**Lf**) increases
to a maximum at the critical frequency.

Pressure has a considerable effect on the dielectric behavior of water. The effect of increased pressure on the dielectric and dielectric loss is to shift the curves to lower frequencies, such that the peak in the dielectric loss shifts to about 4 kHz at about -20 °C and 200 MPa [2072].

[Back to Top ]

Dissolved salt depresses the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) dependent on its
concentration (C ) and the average hydration number of the individual
ions (H_{N})

Dielectric reducing but dielectric loss increasing with temperature

at the microwave oven frequency, 2.45 GHz

**Figure 2. **Dielectric
and dielectric loss of a dilute salt solution between
0 °C and 100 °C (dashed lines; the solid lines
shows the pure water curves as Figure
1 above), the arrows showing the effect of increasing
temperature. Data is indicative only; exact data is plotted below. The salt decreases
the natural structuring of the water so reducing the
static dielectric permittivity, in a similar manner
to increased temperature. At the lower frequencies,
the ions are able to respond and move with the changing
potential so producing frictional heat and increasing
the loss factor (**Lf**). Thus whereas
water becomes a poorer microwave absorber with rising
temperature, a lossy salty food such as salt meat
becomes a better microwave absorber with rising temperature.
The rate that the temperature of such lossy salty
food rises on microwaving increases as it is proportional
to this increasing loss factor and inversely proportional
to the density times specific heat (which change less
with temperature); that is, the hotter it gets,
the quicker it gets hotter.

Plotted opposite are equations derived at 10 parts per thousand w/w (ppt) salinity for the range for -20 °C ~ +40 °C [683], extrapolated (dashed lines) to indicate trends. Further recent data is available [1074].

Plotted opposite are equations derived at 2.45 GHz (typical microwave oven frequency) for different parts per thousand w/w (ppt) salinity for the range for -20 °C ~ +40 °C [683], extrapolated (dashed lines) to indicate trends. The equations that generate these curves involve 46 optimized parameters.

The dielectric loss is increased by a factor that depends on the
conductivity (Λ, S cm^{2} mol^{-1};
S = siemens = mho), concentration and frequency. It increases with a
rise in temperature and decreasing frequency.

Ensuring that all units are SI, the 1000 factor in the denominator goes. This 1000 is a conversion between SI and cm, mol, L units. This emphasizes that careful consideration must be given to the units used in the microwave literature.

Bound water and ice have critical frequencies (λ_{S})
at about 10 MHz (τ about 0.1 μs)
with raised static dielectric permittivities (ε_{S}).
At the much higher frequency of microwave ovens such water has a
low dielectric permittivity (for example, ice-1h, ε_{∞} = 3.1; compare ice-1h, ε_{S} = 97.5 [94]; ε_{S }water (0 °C) = 87.9),_{ }and is almost transparent,
absorbing little energy. This is particularly noticed on thawing
where the thawed material may get very hot whilst unthawed material
stays frozen. Therefore for balanced heating, the thermal effects
must be evenly distributed, that is, there should not be pockets
of salty water within a poorly conducting matrix. [Back to Top ]

The electromagnetic penetration is infinite in a perfectly transparent substance and zero in a reflective material (for example, metals). At the microwave oven frequency (2.45 GHz, λ = 12.24 cm), most energy is absorbed by water. The attenuation (α) is given by:

As

if tanδ is « 1

This equation may be approximated where the attenuation is (approximately) directly proportional to the loss factor and inversely proportional to the wavelength times the square root of the relative dielectric constant:

For a plane wave, incident microwaves decrease to 1/e (0.36788; that is, 63% absorbed) in a penetration distance Dp given approximately by:

and so at 2.45 GHz:

Thus, using water at 25 °C, ε_{r}´
= 78. **Lf** =12, tanδ =
0.15, λ = 12.24 cm and Dp = 1.4 cm but the effect is much greater in supercooled water (that may be present in frozen food) where at -17.78 °C (that is, 0 °F), ε_{r}´
= 74.4. **Lf** =40.1, tanδ =
0.54 and Dp = 0.43 cm [1074].

The amount of power (P, in watts m^{-3}) that is absorbed
is given by:

** P** = 2πfε

where ε_{0} = 8.854x10^{-12} F m^{-1}, f is the frequency (Hz, = ω/2π)
and E is the potential gradient (V m^{-1}). [Back to Top ]

^{a} Hydroxyl groups in sugars
and polysaccharides behave similarly, creating a high shear environment.
Fats exhibit a lesser effect but their lower specific heat gives
rise to rapid heating. [Back]

^{ b} Note the relaxation time
is the reciprocal of the frequency in radians per second whereas
the electromagnetic frequency is commonly reported in cycles per
second (Hz). [Back]

^{ c} The change of static
permittivity with temperature (-35 °C < t < 100 °C)
may be approximated by the equation ε_{S}(t)=A.e^{-bt} where A= 87.85306 and b=0.00456992 [588].
[Back]

^{ d} Due to the observed similarity of the dielectric spectra of water and ice (as they show the similar graphics, only shifted along the frequency axis by six decades), the dielectric spectra has been explained using the assumption of a random walk diffusion of protons without considering the H_{2}O dipole orientations. This is shown to be sufficient to describe both the experimental dielectric spectra of water and ice, as well as their transformation at the freezing-melting point of 0 °C [2171].
[Back]

Home | Site Index | Theory and definitions | Complex dielectric permittivity | Microwaves and health | Water molecule | Water spectra | Notes | LSBU | Top

This page was established in 2001 and last updated by Martin Chaplin on 6 November, 2017

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution

-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License

The preferred Web Browser is Mozilla Firefox